DSM-G600, DNS-3xx and NSA-220 Hack Forum

Unfortunately no one can be told what fun_plug is - you have to see it for yourself.

You are not logged in.

Announcement

#1 2008-04-27 07:27:01

kook
New member
Registered: 2008-04-27
Posts: 2

Post your copying speeds

Just a rough idea of what speeds you guys are getting with this box

Software : 1.04
HDD : 1 x 750GB, WD Green
Network : 1GB, wired
File size : 1.58GB, single RAR file

My bad, previous results were based on 100MB as the socket was lose. Didnt notice till i was checking thru again ;-)

RX from NAS :
NAS -> XP ~4mins @ abt 9MB/s
NAS -> OSX ~3m45-4m19 (real) @ ~8MB/s

TX to NAS :
XP -> NAS ~3-5mins @ ~8M-13MB/s, best performance is abt 13-14MB/s
OSX -> NAS ~1m56-2m14 (real) @ ~14MB/s

Just for kicks, same file, CIFS
OSX -> XP ~1m12-19 (real) @ ~24MB/s
XP -> OSX ~0m47-50 (real) @ ~36-41MB/s

All MTU is 1500, duplex is auto, speed is auto, file is copied 3 times in both directions
OSX is using CIFS, XP might be using default SMB?
XP is a nforce2 board using onboard controller
OSX is a 1st generation macbook using onboard controller

Last edited by kook (2008-04-27 09:53:35)

Offline

 

#2 2008-04-27 07:37:04

blahsome
Member
Registered: 2008-03-02
Posts: 157

Re: Post your copying speeds

What network? wired? wireless? 100Mbps? 1Gbps? 1.5 gigabytes or bits? How many files?

Assuming it's 1.5 gigabytes, that translates to 6.25MB/s TX and 1.79MB/s RX if my calculations are correct... That's a bit slow if you are on a wired connection. Maybe you are transfering a huge number of files, the overhead of which is significant. Also, there shouldn't be that much of a discrepancy between TX and RX speeds.

On a 100M LAN, my DNS-323 pulls around 11-12MB/s, which pretty much saturates the network. On a gigabit Ethernet LAN, it pulls up to 17-18MB/s depending on file size. BTW, these speeds are both read and write.

Last edited by blahsome (2008-04-27 18:34:25)

Offline

 

#3 2008-04-27 08:50:41

Dr Eric Forbin
New member
Registered: 2008-04-21
Posts: 4

Re: Post your copying speeds

I've have benchmarked these boxes extensively using all available storage configs they support.  17-18 megabytes a second are what you're going to get on a gig lan, period.

Offline

 

#4 2008-04-27 09:55:02

kook
New member
Registered: 2008-04-27
Posts: 2

Re: Post your copying speeds

Me bad, had a lose socket while doing the testing so it was originally giving me 100mb performance, but i've went around and rectified it and did more testing smile

Offline

 

#6 2008-04-27 18:09:43

fordem
Member
Registered: 2007-01-26
Posts: 1938

Re: Post your copying speeds

Dr Eric Forbin wrote:

I've have benchmarked these boxes extensively using all available storage configs they support.  17-18 megabytes a second are what you're going to get on a gig lan, period.

17-18 megabytes a second .... period.  That's a strongly worded statement.  I'd say 17~18 MB/sec on gigabit sounds in line with what I see day to day, but, I've been able to reach 20~21 MB/sec, so I wouldn't agree with it.

You need to remember that a file copy has a source, a destination, and a transfer medium - and the transfer speed can be no faster than the slowest of them all - unless you provide information on all three, the results really don't mean that much.

The other end of the copy can also have a major impact - I've found that some Realtek gigabit cards, when used with native Windows drivers provide throughput that would be considered sub par for a 100 mbps LAN, and show significant improvement when used with the manufacturer's drivers.  Disk fragementation can also hold the numbers down.

Oh - my tests were done in my standard home environment - network switch is a Netgear FS728TS, both devices connected to gigabit ports and the other end of the transfer is an IBM xSeries 206, with an onboard Intel gigabit card, running Microsoft Windows Server 2003, fresh install, minimal disk fragmention, disks at both ends are identical Seagate 7200.9 Barracudas.

Offline

 

Board footer

Powered by PunBB
© Copyright 2002–2010 PunBB