DSM-G600, DNS-3xx and NSA-220 Hack Forum

Unfortunately no one can be told what fun_plug is - you have to see it for yourself.

You are not logged in.

Announcement

#1 2009-02-26 12:42:52

craig
Member
Registered: 2009-02-25
Posts: 18

Poll - F/W Version, Disk Setup

Hi,

I was curious as to what was the most popular setup for the DNS-323.

I'm using 1.06, with RAID 1.

If you post what you're packing, I'll edit this post with the results.

EDIT:
This is a slightly selfish post because I'm very curious myself. Seems that a chunk of people still use 1.05. This might just be because it's such a new firmware, and a lot of the support for this thread dates back to 2007. I was also curious because I bought this thing such that I'd be able to store my important documents on it without the fear of it failing. Of course, at the moment I'm doing a lot of modifications so it is probably in a state of increased chance. I've got it set in RAID1, but should I be considering just using JBOD and setting a recurring backup? I've got two 1TB drives, and they are nowhere near full.

Last edited by craig (2009-02-26 12:43:02)

Offline

 

#2 2009-02-26 14:45:53

fordem
Member
Registered: 2007-01-26
Posts: 1938

Re: Poll - F/W Version, Disk Setup

1.06 with RAID1

Judging from the content of your edit, you appear to have misunderstood the purpose of RAID1 - which as my signature says is about disk redundancy, not data backup.

The idea behind redundancy is to keep things running, on a server with redundant power supplies, if one power supply fails, the server continues to run rather than failing, allowing you to schedule the down time required for the repair - which in most cases would be just the removal and replacement of the failed power supply - they are usually "hot swappable" - servers are now built with redundant disk, redundant power, redundant fans, redundant memory, redundant NICs - pretty much everything that is critical to it's function as a server - except the processor and the system board - but if you need that level of redundancy, you can install redundant servers.

Now - all this redundancy does for you is attempt to make sure your data continues to be available, even in times of component failure - but none of it protects your data itself from being lost - files get deleted - a disgruntled employee, an inexperienced new hire, databses become corrupt - viruses, power & network glitches, without a backup, you'd have all of this expensive redundant hardware - and no useable data on it.

One last thing - D-Link uses the term JBOD - just a bunch of disks - in a different context, on a DNS-323 a JBOD configuration concatenates the two disks to form a single volume, and the failure of either disk WILL result in the loss of all data regardless of which physical disk it was stored on.

For example, if you create a JBOD with your 2 x 1TB disks, you'll get a single 2TB Volume_1 - now, store 250GB of data on it, and whilst doing that observe which disk activity light is flashing (I'm going to guess the left side), so you know which physical disk has the data.  Hot unplug the other disk - you should still be able to access your data - until you reboot the system.

Be very careful with the terminology - make sure you understand how it's implemented - before committing your data, and if you place any value at all on the data, make sure you back it up to a different device or removable media

Offline

 

#3 2009-02-26 17:45:27

romanl
Member
Registered: 2009-02-01
Posts: 15

Re: Poll - F/W Version, Disk Setup

1.06, JBOD with 2 WD Caviar Green 500GB.

I don't care about redundancy, as everything that is of any value is backed up, and I can get replacement HDD within 1 day.

Offline

 

#4 2009-02-26 17:48:22

blahsome
Member
Registered: 2008-03-02
Posts: 157

Re: Poll - F/W Version, Disk Setup

1.06, Standard.

Won't even consider RAID0 and JBOD. Well actually for that matter, RAID1 either. smile

Offline

 

#5 2009-03-05 22:19:16

DarkHorseDre
Member
From: London, UK
Registered: 2008-05-13
Posts: 29

Re: Poll - F/W Version, Disk Setup

1.06, with RAID 1, 500gb samsung drives


DNS-323 as stock, with ffp.  Version 1.08, WinXp SP2 on Dell PC and HP laptop. GigE on all links & switch. 802.11g wireless :\

Offline

 

#6 2009-03-05 23:52:29

bripab007
Member
Registered: 2009-02-16
Posts: 39

Re: Poll - F/W Version, Disk Setup

1.06, two 400GB Seagate 7200.11 drives, standard (i.e. no RAID or JBOD).

Offline

 

#7 2009-03-06 01:14:35

bq041
Member
From: USA
Registered: 2008-03-19
Posts: 709

Re: Poll - F/W Version, Disk Setup

See my signature


DNS-323     F/W: 1.04b84  H/W: A1  ffp: 0.5  Drives: 2X 400 GB Seagate SATA-300
DNS-323     F/W: 1.05b28  H/W: B1  ffp: 0.5  Drives: 2X 1 TB  WD SATA-300
DSM-G600   F/W: 1.02       H/W: B                Drive:  500 GB WD ATA

Offline

 

#8 2009-03-06 21:17:05

Loose Gravel
Member
Registered: 2008-10-14
Posts: 50

Re: Poll - F/W Version, Disk Setup

1.05, 2 WD Caviar Green 1TB, Standard (=2 Volumes). TimeMachine Backup Vol1 --> Vol2

Offline

 

#9 2009-03-06 21:52:55

ithrowpicks
Member
From: NE Ohio
Registered: 2008-02-29
Posts: 27

Re: Poll - F/W Version, Disk Setup

1.06,  2 WD Green Power 750 GB drives in RAID 0... looks like a single 1.5 TB drive to clients

I just put copies of data out on the NAS because if a drive dies the original data is still on the PC's.

<waiting for all the responses about using RAID 0 is not smart>

Last edited by ithrowpicks (2009-03-06 21:54:45)


DNS 323 with FW 1.08 : FFP 0.5 : RAID 0 : 2 x Western Digital Caviar GP WD7500AACS 750GB

Offline

 

#10 2009-03-07 01:49:45

Innuendo
Member
Registered: 2009-03-07
Posts: 16

Re: Poll - F/W Version, Disk Setup

I started out with a single Seagate 7200.10 750 GB drive when I first set up my DNS-323. The unit shipped with v1.03 firmware, but I upgraded to v1.04 first thing after installing the drive.

Now I'm running two Seagate 7200.11 1.5TB drives as standard drives under v1.06 firmware.

I cannot comment on firmware v1.03 as I never used it, but v1.04, v1.05, and v1.06 have all been stable for me and each new version has offered increased functionality.

The best thing I ever did was start running the Windows 7 beta as it never forgets my NAS usernames and passwords whereas my old Vista install did all the time.

Offline

 

#11 2009-03-07 03:31:13

btomlin75
Member
Registered: 2009-01-16
Posts: 6

Re: Poll - F/W Version, Disk Setup

FW 1.06 two 1tb hitachi drives raid 1.  unit up for 3 months.  AV server up and has yet failed to stream anything I send to my PS3.  Itunes server up and can sync with 3 different computers an iphone and an ipod.

Offline

 

#12 2009-03-07 21:25:28

craig
Member
Registered: 2009-02-25
Posts: 18

Re: Poll - F/W Version, Disk Setup

Innuendo wrote:

The best thing I ever did was start running the Windows 7 beta as it never forgets my NAS usernames and passwords whereas my old Vista install did all the time.

From what I know, the reason windows "forgets" usernames and passwords is just because they try to mount before you get your network up. Therefore it will always try - but fail to reach the IP address.

There is a possibility that the time it takes to receive a DHCP address for your desktop is the reason behind it. If you tried a static - it might just work. Alternatively, I wonder if there are ways to delay the mounting procedure until after the network.

I just have to live with that annoying popup. smile

Offline

 

Board footer

Powered by PunBB
© Copyright 2002–2010 PunBB