Unfortunately no one can be told what fun_plug is - you have to see it for yourself.
You are not logged in.
Hi,
I have my hdd partitioned like this(not counting the OS partition): Data, Audio, Video, Pictures.
How can I mirror the exact same setting on DNS-323? can you partition the drives after you've formatted them?
Offline
The DNS-323 wants to partition and format your SATA disk drive when you put it in !
On my first internal drive the box created three partitions:
1. A small linux swap partition (type 82)
2. A partition with type 83 (Linux)
3. Another partition with type 83 (Linux)
So be carefull not to loose you data. So make a backup, check that backup is ok, let the box
partition and format your drive and then put back your fotos etc onto the box.
Offline
ThatEvilGuy wrote:
Hi,
I have my hdd partitioned like this(not counting the OS partition): Data, Audio, Video, Pictures.
How can I mirror the exact same setting on DNS-323? can you partition the drives after you've formatted them?
Yes & no - partitioning is the step prior to formatting, and if you re-partition, you need to reformat afterwards.
The DNS-323, out of the box, does not allow custom partitioning such as yours, you may be able to achieve it by getting creative either with fun_plug or partitioning the drives outside of the unit and then re-installing them.
Offline
Thanks for the answer!
Are all NAS boxes like that?(I'm also looking at QNAP TS-201)
It seems very inconvenient and unsafe to have one large partition and just folders: Data,Audio,Video,Pictures, you could accidently drop one folder into another(but I guess you create shortcuts for each folder on the desktop or something)
Also is it true that you can have 2 users from different groups assigned to the same folder? or have they fixed that?
Offline
No - not all NAS servers are like that - I can't comment on the QNAP unit.
Personally - the only problem I see with a single large partition is the possibility of one folder growing to the point where it fills the partition, a problem which (at least in my opinion) is better managed through quotas.
Also - I wasn't aware that having users from more than one group assigned to a folder was a problem that needed to be fixed. I would consider this to be a normal and in fact desirable feature - as an example ....
Let's say I'm running a small business and I have chosen to group my users in to 1) Field Tech Support and 2) Phone Tech Support - if I had a folder called manuals (containing manuals) I would want both groups to have access to it.
Offline
Sorry, it was a typo, I meant "can't" not "can"
I remember reading it somewhere that you couldn't do what you described in your example, and you couldn't assign one group to be RO and the other RW for the same folder.
Offline
Prior to this discussion I had not used either users or groups with my DNS-323 - so I created two groups and a couple of users and assigned one each to the groups, I created a folder and assigned it to one group read only, and the other group read/write.
The end results were not quite as expected - in that the DNS-323 created two shares with different names - Manuals and Manuals-1 - however, my users had the appropriate access rights in the shares.
Offline
That's what I was talking about!
Annyoing "bug"
Does assigning users(with different access rights) from the same group to the folder do the same -1 thing or does it work properly?
Offline
Seems to me like you're not familiar with how users & groups should be used.
1) Create your groups
2) Create your users and assign them to groups
3) Assign the folder to a group, with the appropriate access rights.
Whilst you can assign a folder to an individual user, this sort of negates the purpose of groups.
Offline
But the way you describe it doesn't work with DNS-323, as you saw, it created a Manuals-1 folder, a completely new one.
2 different groups can't share the same folder in DNS-323
So that's why I asked if creating a single group with users of different privileges and assigning them(that group) a folder would work?
Last edited by ThatEvilGuy (2007-06-26 00:20:11)
Offline
No - I created one folder - which the DNS-323 "exported" as two shares, if you like two - two shortcuts to the same folder, each one with different permissions.
Two different groups CAN share the same folder.
As for your question on a single group of users of different privileges - this is not how users and groups are used to manage access. The group is given the access rights and you add/remove users from the group.
The DNS-323 appears to limit the number of groups a user can belong to, but this would appear to be more of an inconvenience than a problem, especially given the intended market.
Offline
Super! glad you can do that, thanks a lot for explaining/confirming this to me Fordem!
Offline