Unfortunately no one can be told what fun_plug is - you have to see it for yourself.
You are not logged in.
I was looking at ftp://ftp.dlink.com/GPL/DNS-323/ and noticed that the file time-stamps are quite recent, for example
File:Readme.txt 6 KB 01/02/2008 19:19:00
I can't remember what was there before that date though. Have the files been recently updated to account for the 1.04 firmware release?
Is there a change log, or can anyone spot any changes?
Additionally, the readme in that FTP folder states that the toolchain should use the kernel headers from kernel-headers-2.6.9.1.tar.bz2, but my DNS323 has kernel version 2.6.12.6 according to 'uname -a', and the wiki says that firmware version 1.03 used the same version.
If I was building a toolchain, should I use the correct version number here? What difference does it make?
Last edited by sjmac (2008-04-10 10:46:51)
Offline
I noticed that the samba tar ball is version 3.0.24 and the linux tar ball
is 2.6.12.6, so I'm pretty sure that these are the source file for FWv1.04.
Found this in a previous thread, too http://dns323.kood.org/forum/p10200-200 … tml#p10200
Offline
Yep, of course - sorry I missed the obvious bits!
So if kernel 2.6.12.6 is bundled, why is the readme suggesting that I download and link the 2.6.9.1 kernel headers? A typo?
vi kernel-headers.mk
change ==> LINUX_SOURCE:=kernel-headers-2.4.21.tar.bz2 --> LINUX_SOURCE:=kernel-headers-2.6.9.1.tar.bz2
What sort of things will break with this version number skew when I run them on my DNS323?
Last edited by sjmac (2008-04-10 19:13:21)
Offline