DSM-G600, DNS-3xx and NSA-220 Hack Forum

richneo wrote:

I started this thread with the purpose of letting the brothers and sisters here know that we might be able to have the official BT support in the next firmware and hopefully, if there are any one out there currently testing it, can share the firmware.

AFAIK, no one has reported using D-Link FWv1.05 and you and Dlink are the only two user that have reported seeing a DNS-323 running this firmware.
It is encouraging to see D-link's progress on the new firmware; however, please heed Dlink's post http://dns323.kood.org/forum/p13217.html#p13217
this will not be a 'power user' btorrent implementation.

richneo wrote:

And Guys, please stop worrying about the NDA and violations thingy. It is not a matter of ours to be concerned about.

It should not surprise you to find there are folks on this forum,  that do concern themselves with NDAs and intellectual property rights,
and your post is being scrutinized, especially, given the lack of details that accompanied your posted image.

richneo wrote:

After all, Sharing IS Caring right?

You might find that a 'Robin Hood' approach to sharing is not appreciated, as much as, open honest communication.

Last edited by mig (2008-04-10 23:47:35)

mig wrote:

richneo wrote:

I started this thread with the purpose of letting the brothers and sisters here know that we might be able to have the official BT support in the next firmware and hopefully, if there are any one out there currently testing it, can share the firmware.

AFAIK, no one has reported using D-Link FWv1.05 and you and Dlink are the only two user that have reported seeing a DNS-323 running this firmware.
It is encouraging to see D-link's progress on the new firmware; however, please heed Dlink's post http://dns323.kood.org/forum/p13217.html#p13217
this will not be a 'power user' btorrent implementation.

Thank you for highlighting dlink's stand that this is not a power users implementation BUT there are still people who wants to try out the original BT firmware from D-Link.

Hi Dlink...haven't heard much on the progress of 1.05 firmware update. Is there an ETA for the firmware?

I purchased my DNS-323 over a month ago and looking at issues some people are experiencing with the drive failure light, I've decided to wait until 1.05...plus it includes BitTorrent capabilities.

I will be using 2 x WD10EACS drives so I hope 1.05 may have tested on these 1 TB drives?

Cheers.

Tilly wrote:

noisuf wrote:

Hi Dlink...haven't heard much on the progress of 1.05 firmware update. Is there an ETA for the firmware?

There are two versions of 1.05 but so far non is officially released.

I expect to release 1.05 early next week. It is pretty common practice not to release on fridays due to...well stuff happens and its uncontrollable from my couch at home! Regardless, the official release version will be 1.05b28(will be name 1.05 on US support site next week).

-Dlink

Dlink wrote:

I expect to release 1.05 early next week. It is pretty common practice not to release on fridays due to...well stuff happens and its uncontrollable from my couch at home! Regardless, the official release version will be 1.05b28(will be name 1.05 on US support site next week).

-Dlink

Can you tease us with the Release notes and/or let us know if the bug with the uPnp server on file > 4GB is fixed?

Cheers!
BSPvette86

bspvette86 wrote:

Can you tease us with the Release notes and/or let us know if the bug with the uPnp server on file > 4GB is fixed?

Here please the change log since the version 1.04b84:

v1.04b86    02/20/2008    1.Fixed Print Server unable to work issue.

v1.05b6        03/21/2008    1.Fixed HDD formatting stop at 94% easily issue.
                2.iTunes Server : fixed the non-stop issue when refreshing plenty of mp3 files.
                3.Email Alert : fixed doesn't accept .info domain issue.
                4.Support BT.
                5.Normal to Raid1.
                6.Support Jumbo Frame.

v1.05bx        04/07/2008    1.FTP Server support Korean and Turkish codepages.
                2.Add BT descriptions and updates Jumbo Frame descriptions to support page.

v1.05bx        04/25/2008    1.Fixed Normal to Raid1 crashed Web server issue.
                2.Changes BT warning message when no BT is installed.

v1.05bx        04/30/2008    1.Fixed Network Access List messed up after installing BT in Raid mode.
                2.Fixed Shared folder invalid after installing BT in Raid mode.

v1.05b28    05/05/2008    1.Adds a Warning message to inform user regarding to HDD's space will lost without using a identical HDD for Normal to Raid1 creation.

Tilly wrote:

bspvette86 wrote:

Can you tease us with the Release notes and/or let us know if the bug with the uPnp server on file > 4GB is fixed?

Here please the change log since the version 1.04b84:

v1.04b86    02/20/2008    1.Fixed Print Server unable to work issue.

v1.05b6        03/21/2008    1.Fixed HDD formatting stop at 94% easily issue.
                2.iTunes Server : fixed the non-stop issue when refreshing plenty of mp3 files.
                3.Email Alert : fixed doesn't accept .info domain issue.
                4.Support BT.
                5.Normal to Raid1.
                6.Support Jumbo Frame.

v1.05bx        04/07/2008    1.FTP Server support Korean and Turkish codepages.
                2.Add BT descriptions and updates Jumbo Frame descriptions to support page.

v1.05bx        04/25/2008    1.Fixed Normal to Raid1 crashed Web server issue.
                2.Changes BT warning message when no BT is installed.

v1.05bx        04/30/2008    1.Fixed Network Access List messed up after installing BT in Raid mode.
                2.Fixed Shared folder invalid after installing BT in Raid mode.

v1.05b28    05/05/2008    1.Adds a Warning message to inform user regarding to HDD's space will lost without using a identical HDD for Normal to Raid1 creation.

Those release notes are missing the addition of LLTD support for vista . I am sure something else got left out but I would have to browse around the device to remember what was missed.

Again I expect to release the firmware early next week officially if it doesn't get leaked before then.

Dlink wrote:

Those release notes are missing the addition of LLTD support for vista . I am sure something else got left out but I would have to browse around the device to remember what was missed.

Again I expect to release the firmware early next week officially if it doesn't get leaked before then.

Is this OK for you?

http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Link_Layer … _Discovery

Last edited by Tilly (2008-05-10 00:50:51)

---

Attachments:
Fw_1-05b6_LLTD-Settings.jpg, Size: 59,134 bytes, Downloads: 278

Nasp wrote:

well,  i think many people are waiting for this new firmware for dns-323, because of the BT suport in firmware..

But i think it is only a "extra" of features, because programs like Transmission is always better and better than any firmware like this. The suport is better and more aceptable in private trackers....etc..etc.

But is good, and function only it a extra.

You have to also remember that the majority of our customers do not go to this forum. They are simple end users that want a product and features that are competetive in todays market. It is designed to be easy to use and simplistic because we already know that users here are just going to customize their own units anyways.

And yes Tilly better =P

i wanna know if the harmless but nasty message

md: mdadm(pid 1706) used obsolete MD ioctl, upgrade your software to use new ictls.

is gone?

noisuf wrote:

Dlink, Tilly and everyone...thanks for the update on v1.05 and it's imminent release next week.

Will be looking out for it in anticipation via daily visits to the Dlink site.

its officially released

http://dns323.kood.org/forum/p14626-Tod … tml#p14626

http://www.dlink.com.sg/support/Support … upport=297

http://www.dlink.com.sg/support/Support … upport=298

What is mac users to do with this crap?

santos777 wrote:

What is mac users to do with this crap?

Strange question - I have to assume that you're a Mac user and you're not happy with your DNS-323 - and why I find that strange is that, although I've never tried to access my DNS-323 from a Mac, I understand it works quite well.

Perhaps you like to do explain the question and tell us why you're not happy - maybe someone can help