Unfortunately no one can be told what fun_plug is - you have to see it for yourself.
You are not logged in.
There is a new firmware version 1.06B60.
http://www.dl-support.de/forum/viewtopi … 954#140954
But with this i find a problem with the email alert mail accounts.
Offline
Looks like a beta to me. I'll skip it for now.
Offline
Just out of curiosity - how can you tell if it's a beta?
Offline
Tilly wrote:
There is a new firmware version 1.06B60.
http://www.dl-support.de/forum/viewtopi … 954#140954
But with this i find a problem with the email alert mail accounts.
Because your posting something thats 2 builds behind what we are actually working on.
Offline
Dlink wrote:
Because your posting something thats 2 builds behind what we are actually working on.
If always new bugs build in a new version than never a bug free version will be released.
Offline
there was a b62 a couple of week back
Offline
richneo wrote:
there was a b62 a couple of week back
Where?
Offline
i have try it and the only problem i see was tha fan being off until 45ēC...the case become very hot for my taste.
Offline
pbls wrote:
i have try it and the only problem i see was tha fan being off until 45ēC...the case become very hot for my taste.
That's the fun part of user feedback - first you get a bunch of people complaining of the fan not turning off, so you change it so that it does - and then you get a bunch more complaining that it does - that's not a flaw, that's a feature.
From the change list ...
Turn off Fan when the system temperature reached 43 degrees Celsius : 43(OFF), 46(LOW), 49(HIGH).
Anyone remember Aesop's fables - I believe there is one about a man, his son and their donkey ...
Offline
I agree with pbls... Adding fan control is a welcome addition to the firmware.. I just wish Dlink would make the temps user configurable within safe ranges. If they don't I'll continue to use fanctl - which aside from the sporadic TWSI issues seems to be working well for me.
Offline
I guess it's a matter of personal opinion - I have an indicated 46* and I would consider the case temperature as barely warm.
Offline
Thumbs up for dlink having implemented the fan-stop at low temperatures! agree with fordem, 46 degrees celsius is not hot. if you dont like it use fanctrl.
cheerio
Offline
w00 wrote:
Thumbs up for dlink having implemented the fan-stop at low temperatures! agree with fordem, 46 degrees celsius is not hot. if you dont like it use fanctrl.
cheerio
I think (correct if I'm wrong) - the temperature measurement is taken on the mainboard located down low in the case (under the hard drives). Cool air enters under the front panel and is directed rearward through a slot under the circuit board. So the upper area of the case gets considerably warmer - specially when using the really large capacity drives (1 TB or >). I find my WD Caviar Blacks get quite warm, even though the temperature reading from the MB is still fairly low. So I'd like to kick the fan in at higher speed and lower temp.
Offline
Does anyone know if this firmware (or any future) will include a newer kernel?
Offline
jesbo wrote:
I think (correct if I'm wrong) - the temperature measurement is taken on the mainboard located down low in the case (under the hard drives). Cool air enters under the front panel and is directed rearward through a slot under the circuit board. So the upper area of the case gets considerably warmer - specially when using the really large capacity drives (1 TB or >). I find my WD Caviar Blacks get quite warm, even though the temperature reading from the MB is still fairly low. So I'd like to kick the fan in at higher speed and lower temp.
I'm not going to say you're wrong - but - with a backup running to keep the drives active, I've measured the temperature, both on the top of the case and in the "disk cavity" and found them to be at 100*F when the status page is reporting 122*F.
This was done with a temperature probe, in the first case taped to the outside of the case, and the second stuck through the bottom of the front panel, past the disk activity LEDs and into the air space inbetween the disks
Offline
vedeja wrote:
Does anyone know if this firmware (or any future) will include a newer kernel?
My understanding is that the kernel has not changed (unfortunately )
Offline
puterboy wrote:
My understanding is that the kernel has not changed (unfortunately )
Bummer.
Offline
vedeja wrote:
Does anyone know if this firmware (or any future) will include a newer kernel?
Just curious, is there some particular functionality that you want, which requires a newer kernel?
Offline
puterboy wrote:
vedeja wrote:
Does anyone know if this firmware (or any future) will include a newer kernel?
My understanding is that the kernel has not changed (unfortunately )
Is there any chance to replace that one with a newer one by applying patches and so on?
xfs filesystem for example and fixes to get the non-working ext3 up would be really nice to have.
Offline
wirbel wrote:
xfs filesystem for example and fixes to get the non-working ext3 up would be really nice to have.
Over at the Linkstation forum and the xfs mailing list there are many issues with XFS + ARM:
http://buffalo.nas-central.org/forums/v … amp;t=6706
That means: You can't simply take a vanilla kernel, patch it a little bit and expect it to work. I know Linkstation is shipping their boxes with XFS, it requires tremendous testing by the vendor. And there are still issues with XFS. E.g. see here:
"Oct 3 15:13:59 NAS_1 kernel: Out of Memory: Kill process 1118 (xfs_repair) score 3824 and children."
http://buffalo.nas-central.org/forums/v … mp;t=12106
Given how long it takes D-Link (or their subcontractor for firmware development) to release simple application fixes such as the firmware 1.06, I would recommend D-Link NOT to experiment with XFS at all. Ext3 should be fine though.
Instead of fiddeling with the kernel, I suggest get the applications straight and provide a convenient way of rebuilding a RAID1. It simply can't be the case that D-Link is the only hardware failing simple RAID1 tests:
http://www.smallnetbuilder.com/content/ … 21/75/1/2/
http://www.smallnetbuilder.com/content/ … 35/75/1/2/
I know in this case all you have to know: insert a drive without a partition table. However: If your RAID1 fails and you don't have another SATA enabled computer you might run into problems providing a SATA drive with empty partition table.
Offline
First time ever that i read about probs with xfs. I'm running xfs two or three years now on my linuxfromscratch box and doesnt had any problems so far. Performance is - especially for large files which i have - very good.
Seems that this one is ARM related somehow. But ext3 would be also acceptable for me.
Last edited by wirbel (2008-11-26 19:28:39)
Offline
mig wrote:
vedeja wrote:
Does anyone know if this firmware (or any future) will include a newer kernel?
Just curious, is there some particular functionality that you want, which requires a newer kernel?
Well, kernel 2.6.12.6 is by now a very old and (notoriously) buggy kernel. Also, the d-link version is highly patched which has introduced further issues.
An up-to-date kernel would allow the following:
- working ext3 (it's a crime that a nas has neither journaling nor even automatic fsck)
- working fuse and ntfs-3g
- avoidance of the kludgey patches that were introduced to get the kernel to run on Linux vs. the latest arm git version that reportedly is properly patched.
Plus 2.6.12.6 is probably at least 3 years old now -- which is a lifetime in kernel development. So, a lot of current stuff won't work with the old kernel and developers aren't willing to backport or bugfix their applications for a kernel that old.
Offline
mig wrote:
vedeja wrote:
Does anyone know if this firmware (or any future) will include a newer kernel?
Just curious, is there some particular functionality that you want, which requires a newer kernel?
For my part I am so badly needing FTDI USB serial drivers which are not part of the present kernel. You can search the forum for details about why I want that.
Offline