Unfortunately no one can be told what fun_plug is - you have to see it for yourself.
You are not logged in.
Pages: 1
Hi,
On my CH3SNAS I can only ad 1 users to 1 group and give this group access to a directory. I cannot add another user to this group.
If I want to give more users acces to a certain dir I have to do this for each user.
So I'm wondering how the users and groups is working on the DNS-323?
I've tried each version of the released firmware of the CH3SNAS so if the DNS-323 is working differend it could be a bug.
Offline
it's just working 'fine'
added multiple users to the groups. Although i wrote you earlier in another forum that there is actually a bug with removing shares (cause trashcan is not doing it's job) ..
http://www.aroundmyroom.com/ch3snas/userslist.jpg
but in general the functionality of users and groups for ch3snas is eqal to dns 323
zeroday
Offline
Your not getting the point, try to add user zeroday to another group called test2.......
Offline
i2Paq wrote:
Your not getting the point, try to add user zeroday to another group called test2.......
"
I can only ad 1 users to 1 group and give this group access to a directory. I cannot add another user to this group. "
if you read your text you report that you can only add one user to one group not that one user is not able to be added to multiple groups.
It was a little confusing. But I get the point totally and maybe we can review that feature.
Zeroday
Offline
zeroday wrote:
i2Paq wrote:
Your not getting the point, try to add user zeroday to another group called test2.......
"
I can only ad 1 users to 1 group and give this group access to a directory. I cannot add another user to this group. "
if you read your text you report that you can only add one user to one group not that one user is not able to be added to multiple groups.
It was a little confusing. But I get the point totally and maybe we can review that feature.
Zeroday
OK, sorry for the miscommunication on my point.
Hopefully now that this is clear you can iron out this "bug"
Offline
i2Paq wrote:
OK, sorry for the miscommunication on my point.
Hopefully now that this is clear you can iron out this "bug"
not a bug but a design .. maybe not a good design and therefore under review ;-)
Offline
zeroday wrote:
i2Paq wrote:
OK, sorry for the miscommunication on my point.
Hopefully now that this is clear you can iron out this "bug"not a bug but a design .. maybe not a good design and therefore under review ;-)
Sounds like a Microsoft excuus
Offline
Pages: 1